At the risk of repeating myself, one of the things I love best about living in a city is its diversity. For some unfathomable reason, my bank manager won’t let me book that round-the-world ticket. So I’ve settled in a place where I can see as much of the world as possible with the minimum of outlay. And on a job that gives me the opportunity to talk to people from a huge range of cultures. I just find people infinitely fascinating.
Maybe it’s my way to rebel against my upbringing. In 1960s England ‘our way’ was ‘the right way’. Everyone else was ‘wrong’. Unquestionable. Boys wore short trousers. Even in blizzards. Tea and coffee were drunk from cups. With saucers. Potatoes were peeled in ice cold water. Regardless of chilblains. Bread was buttered and cut in triangles. And denim jeans were only worn by dustmen. My mother was so worried about what people would think that both she and one of my brothers missed a church picnic because said brother refused to take off his new baseball boots and put on ‘proper shoes’.
Keeping up appearances was crucial in late twentieth century England. It still is of course. Although in very different ways. We have a whole new set of criteria for social acceptance now. Gone are the days of politeness. Consideration. Respect (which, by the way, I’ve always taken to mean treating others the way you would like them to treat you. Not servility). Community. Instead we have greed. Who’d have thought that would ever become a virtue? Competition. Physical attractiveness. Wearing the right labels in your clothes. iPhones. It seems we’re programmed to follow. We don’t like to stand out in a crowd. And we’re suspicious of anything ‘different’. Even when the criteria for ‘different’ have changed.
Change. That’s the other thing we don’t like. Even though it’s the only certainty this side of the next world. Apart from death and taxes. We don’t like them much either. I sometimes think I’d love to go back to the way things were when I was nineteen. I wouldn’t. I’d just like to be nineteen again. Only this time with all the wisdom of hindsight. I don’t want to give up my laptop. My blog. My central heating. Or the freedom of gender equality. However theoretical that may remain. I wouldn’t want to go back to a world full of irrational discrimination. On the grounds of gender. Ethnicity. Skin colour. Sexuality. Disability. Where Jimmy Saville could roam unfettered. Enoch Powell could spew poison without sanction. Where it had only recently ceased to be a criminal offence for two men to love each other. Where I could be told there was no point in promoting me because I was married. And have no comeback. That wasn’t freedom. That was a licence for the powerful and privileged to run roughshod over the rest of us.
Yet the more I look around me, the more I see people yearning for ‘the good old days’. Hankering after a mythical past in which we all knew where we stood. Even if that was right up to our necks in a heap of something very nasty. My Facebook feed has seen a steadily increasing flow of posts about extreme elements in British politics. Preaching hatred. Inflaming prejudice. Masquerading as saviours of the nation.
It seems to me that these people seek to divide us against ourselves. Set workers of diverse ethnic backgrounds at each other’s throats. Pitch ‘strivers’ against ‘skivers’. Whip up prejudice against the poor. Pour suspicion on anyone whose lifestyle deviates from the ‘norm’. As measured by their standards of course. Fuel suspicion toward those with disabilities. Anything to distract us from the people who are really taking us to the cleaners. The wealthy one per cent. The wolves. Divide and rule. The order of the day.
I’ve carefully avoided mention of any particular political party so far. The article that caught my attention this morning this morning will blow my cover, should you choose to click on the link. I was brought up to believe that my parents’ generation fought a war to prevent a man with views like this from taking over the country. Yet people are looking to a political party that can contain Geoffrey Clark, who advocates COMPULSORY abortion for babies who have disabilities. William Henwood, who wants Lenny Henry to ‘go to a black country’. Gerard Batten, who thinks all Muslims should sign a charter rejecting terrorism. David Silvester, who enabled us all to breathe a sigh of relief. Those floods had nothing to do with climate change. It was all down to same-sex marriage. Oh, and Gordon Gillick, who is alleged to have asked a group of young people in care how it felt to be ‘takers’ from the system. As if they had a choice in the matter.
Add to that little lot Godfrey Bloom, who thinks I should spend more time cleaning behind my fridge, not trouble my pretty little head about politics, and I’m getting worried. Do we really believe things were better when we had less freedom? Do we want a less diverse, less interesting society? Do we see the past through such rose-tinted spectacles that we want to crawl back to it? Clinging to a chewed security blanket that was never really the way we imagine it was?
I don’t need to tell you what I think. So I’ll allow a voice from the past to have the last word. With due acknowledgement to my friend Aletheia for posting this on Facebook at exactly the right time.
But if you want money for people with minds that hate,
then all I can tell you is brother you’ll have to wait …
I’m blogging to raise funds for a charity close to my heart. I’ve given up NOT being a writer for 125 days in support of One25’s work with vulnerable women in Bristol. If you’ve enjoyed reading this, you can find out more about what I’m doing by visiting One25’s website at http://www.one25.org.uk/. You can also support them by visiting my fund raising page at http://uk.virginmoneygiving.com/fundraiser-web/fundraiser/showFundraiserProfilePage.action?userUrl=JeanMutch where you can make a donation and suggest an idea for a short story or a post on the blog. Thank you.